Ordering on UberEats feels like navigating an airport without signs

Role

Primary UX/UI Researcher

Skills

UX Research, User Testing, Heuristic Evaluation

Duration

10 weeks, Winter 2025

1. The Problem

UberEats is designed to make food delivery fast and convenient, connecting users with local restaurants at the tap of a button. The promise is simple: a seamless dining experience without leaving home.

But imagine a food delivery service where finding a meal was truly effortless, pricing was transparent, and checkout was clear—no second-guessing, no hidden fees, just a smooth ordering experience.


The reality? Ordering on UberEats feels like navigating an airport without signs. Experienced users rely on learned shortcuts just to complete basic tasks, while both new and frequent users face unnecessary friction at every turn.


The Challenge

"How might we make UberEats more intuitive and transparent, ensuring users can easily find what they need and understand costs without unnecessary friction?"

2. Research Approach

To understand why UberEats users experience friction while ordering, we examined the core issues impacting navigation, transparency, and overall user experience. We analyzed who our main users are, how they interact with the platform, and how UberEats compares to competitors in the food delivery space.

Our Research Framework

🔍 Competitive Landscape

We compared UberEats to leading competitors such as DoorDash, Grubhub, Postmates, and McDonald's—evaluating their app store ratings, unique features, and approaches to pricing transparency.

💬 User Voices

We conducted 22 user interviews to gather insights from real users, identifying key frustrations and recurring themes in their ordering process.

📊 Pain Point Mapping

We performed heuristic evaluations and mapped where friction occurs in the user journey, measuring severity to prioritize areas for improvement.

By gathering insights from real users and industry benchmarks, we identified key friction points that disrupt the ordering experience, insights that guided our approach to making UberEats a more intuitive, transparent, and user, friendly platform.

3. What We Discovered

Competitive Analysis: The Landscape

Our research revealed a critical insight: DoorDash dominates user preference, with 80% of survey respondents choosing it as their preferred food delivery service. UberEats ranked #3 in the App Store's Food & Drink category, indicating strong market presence but room for improvement.

Key Competitive Findings:

DoorDash (80% user preference)

  • Clearer pricing transparency upfront

  • More intuitive navigation structure

  • Stronger brand loyalty

Grubhub

  • Founded 2004, established market presence

  • Revenue from restaurant commissions and delivery fees

  • Mixed user reviews on fee transparency

Postmates (Direct Competitor)

  • Nearly identical UI to Uber Eats

  • Surge pricing model

  • Less specialized, delivers food and other goods

  • Focus on bigger cities

  • UberOne heavily promoted throughout app

Opportunity Gap: UberEats has significant opportunity to differentiate through improved transparency, personalization, and navigation—areas where competitors still struggle but where UberEats can lead.


User Voices: What Real Users Are Saying

Through 22 user interviews, we uncovered powerful insights into the UberEats experience. Here's what users told us:

On Choice Overload:

"It's like Netflix... you just keep scrolling and scrolling"

On Search Functionality:

"If I search cinnamon rolls, a pizza place pops up with cinnamon sticks"

On Visual Clutter:

"Featured/Promotions sections take up too much space—it's distracting"

What Works:

  • "Nearby" category is frequently used and valued

  • Map feature exists but is underutilized (users don't know about it)

  • Categories help reduce overwhelm when they're clear and organized

Survey Results:

We measured overall satisfaction with UberEats across 22 respondents. Ratings ranged from 2 to 10, with responses clustered around the middle range—indicating mixed satisfaction and significant room for improvement.

Meet the Users: Three Key Personas

By segmenting users into personas, we uncovered distinct needs, motivations, and pain points—from unclear delivery updates to difficulties in reordering. These personas represent the spectrum of UberEats users and their unique challenges.

Pain Points Mapped: Where Friction Lives

By mapping user pain points and their severity through heuristic evaluation, we gained a clearer understanding of where friction occurs in the UberEats experience. While both new and experienced users face challenges, certain frustrations stood out as critical obstacles to user trust and retention.

Critical Pain Points by User Type:

THE NEWBIE USER (Jordan)

🚨 Personalization & Discovery (Severity: 4/5)

  • Overwhelming number of restaurant options without guidance

  • Search results lack precision (e.g., searching "cinnamon rolls" returns pizza places)

  • No personalized recommendations for new users in unfamiliar areas

🚨 Pricing Transparency (Severity: 4/5)

  • Hidden fees appear at checkout

  • No clear cost breakdown before order confirmation

  • Unexpected charges erode trust

⚠️ System Navigation (Severity: 3/5)

  • Steep learning curve for first-time users

  • No effective onboarding process

  • Map feature exists but is hidden/underutilized

THE EXPERIENCED USER (Aaron & Lily)

🚨 Personalization & Discovery (Severity: 4/5)

  • No streamlined reorder functionality despite frequent use

  • Lack of saved dietary preferences or allergen filters

  • Decision fatigue from repetitive browsing

🚨 Pricing Transparency (Severity: 4/5)

  • Delivery fees still unclear even for regular users

  • Promotional pricing creates confusion

  • Total cost not visible until final checkout step

⚠️ System Navigation (Severity: 3/5)

  • Can't edit address after order submission (Severity: 4/5)

  • No "edit items" button, only "add items" (inconsistency)

  • No search function in help settings (Severity: 3/5)

  • Lack of visual/auditory feedback for successful actions

Additional Heuristic Findings:

Consistency Issues:

  • "Add items" vs. "Edit items" terminology inconsistent

  • Visual feedback missing for key actions

Error Prevention:

  • Can't modify address after submission (forces cancellation)

  • No confirmation for critical actions

Help & Documentation:

  • Help settings lack search functionality

  • Difficult to find answers to common questions

4. The Opportunity

These insights helped us assess UberEats' performance across key experience factors that influence customer trust, ease of use, and long-term engagement. We identified three strategic focus areas for improvement:

🎯 EASE OF USE

Goal: Simplify navigation and ordering to reduce friction and improve efficiency.

What We Found:

  • Users struggle with overwhelming choice without clear filtering

  • Search functionality lacks precision (irrelevant results)

  • Map feature exists but is underutilized due to poor visibility

  • No streamlined reorder process for frequent users

  • Can't edit address after order submission

  • Missing visual/auditory feedback for successful actions


Recommendations:

  1. Optimize Search & Discovery

    • Improve search algorithm precision

    • Implement smart filtering based on user context

    • Surface the map feature more prominently

  2. Streamline Reordering

    • Add one-tap reorder from order history

    • Save favorite restaurants and items

    • Create personalized "Quick Order" section

  3. Improve System Feedback

    • Add visual confirmation for all key actions

    • Allow address editing after submission

    • Implement consistent "edit" vs. "add" terminology


Potential Impact: Faster ordering, reduced abandonment, improved satisfaction for both new and experienced users. Estimated 20-30% reduction in time-to-order.

🤝 BUILDING TRUST

Goal: Increase pricing clarity and minimize unexpected fees to strengthen user confidence.

What We Found:

  • Hidden fees appear at checkout, creating negative surprises

  • No clear cost breakdown visible during restaurant/item selection

  • Promotional pricing creates confusion

  • Users feel "tricked" by unexpected charges

  • 80% of users prefer DoorDash, partly due to clearer pricing

Recommendations:

  1. Transparent Cost Breakdown

    • Display all fees (delivery, service, taxes) upfront on restaurant pages

    • Show estimated total before adding items to cart

    • Provide clear explanations for each charge

  2. Pricing Clarity Throughout Journey

    • Sticky price summary visible while browsing menu

    • No surprises at checkout—all costs shown earlier

    • Clear comparison of delivery vs. pickup costs

  3. Build Trust Through Communication

    • Explain why fees vary (distance, demand, restaurant)

    • Highlight savings opportunities clearly

    • Provide price history for regular users


Potential Impact: Increased trust, reduced cart abandonment (estimated 15-25% improvement), higher completion rates, improved user satisfaction scores.

💚 DRIVING LOYALTY

Goal: Personalize the experience to keep users engaged and encourage repeat usage.

What We Found:

  • No personalized recommendations despite order history

  • Reordering is cumbersome even for frequent users

  • Dietary restrictions and allergen info difficult to find

  • New users in unfamiliar cities get no location-based guidance

  • Experienced users still face same friction as new users

Recommendations:

  1. Smart Personalization

    • Recommend restaurants based on order history and preferences

    • Create personalized homepage for returning users

    • Suggest new restaurants similar to favorites

  2. Saved Preferences & Dietary Filters

    • Allow users to save dietary restrictions (vegan, gluten-free, allergens)

    • Filter restaurants and menu items automatically

    • Display allergen information at item level

  3. Context-Aware Features

    • Detect new locations and offer local recommendations

    • Adjust suggestions based on time of day and past patterns

    • Provide better onboarding for first-time users

  4. Enhanced Reorder Experience

    • One-tap reorder from history

    • "Order Again" section on homepage

    • Save custom orders with modifications

Potential Impact: Increased repeat usage (estimated 30-40% improvement in retention), higher customer lifetime value, stronger brand loyalty, reduced reliance on promotions to drive orders.

5: Envisioning Solutions

Although this case study did not extend into prototyping, we created example screens to illustrate potential improvements based on our research insights. These mockups highlight opportunities to refine the user experience and could serve as a foundation for further exploration and iteration.

Our Usability Test Plan Focused on Three Key Features:

FEATURE 1: Personalized Recommendations and Search (2 mins)

The Problem:
Users like Lily and Jordan are overwhelmed by too many options without guidance. Search results lack precision, and new users in unfamiliar cities have no personalized recommendations.

The Solution:
Implement smart, context-aware recommendations and improved search functionality.

Key Improvements:

  • Personalized homepage based on order history and preferences

  • Location-aware suggestions for users in new cities

  • Improved search algorithm with precise, relevant results

  • Quick filters for dietary restrictions and price range

Test Questions:

  • How clear are the personalized recommendations?

  • Does the search functionality feel more precise?

  • Do you feel less overwhelmed by choices?

Research Connection: Addresses Lily's decision fatigue and Jordan's difficulty navigating in new areas (Severity 4/5 pain points).

FEATURE 2: Cost Breakdown Visibility (4 mins)


The Problem:

Both new and experienced users encounter unexpected fees at checkout. Lack of pricing transparency erodes trust and leads to cart abandonment.

The Solution:

Display all costs upfront with clear breakdowns throughout the ordering journey.


Key Improvements:

  • Visible cost breakdown on restaurant pages (before adding items)

  • Sticky price summary while browsing menu

  • Clear explanation of each fee (delivery, service, taxes)

  • No surprises at checkout—all costs shown earlier


Test Questions:

  • How confident do you feel about the total cost before checkout?

  • Are the fees clearly explained?

  • Do you feel more or less likely to complete your order?


Research Connection: Directly addresses the #1 trust issue for both Jordan and Aaron (Severity 4/5 pain point). Tackles the competitive disadvantage vs. DoorDash.

FEATURE 3: Optimized Navigation + Onboarding (6 mins)

The Problem:

New users face a steep learning curve. Experienced users can't efficiently reorder or edit key information. System lacks consistency and helpful feedback.

The Solution:
Streamlined navigation with effective onboarding for new users and efficiency features for experienced users.

Key Improvements:

  • Interactive onboarding for first-time users

  • One-tap reorder from order history

  • Ability to edit address after order submission

  • Prominent map feature for location-based discovery

  • Search functionality in help settings

  • Consistent visual/auditory feedback for actions

Test Questions:

  • How easy was it to navigate the app?

  • Did you feel guided or lost during the process?

  • How quickly could you complete your desired task?

Research Connection: Addresses navigation friction for all three personas (Severity 3-4/5 pain points). Improves both new user onboarding and experienced user efficiency.

6: Impact and Reflection

UberEats is successful, but our research revealed that even loyal customers face unnecessary friction. By improving transparency and navigation, UberEats can reduce user frustration, build trust, and increase repeat usage.

Key Takeaways:

🔍 Research Insight:
The most significant barrier to user satisfaction isn't the breadth of restaurant options—it's the lack of guidance and transparency in navigating those options. Users want personalization, not just more choices.

📊 Competitive Reality:
With 80% of survey respondents preferring DoorDash, UberEats faces a clear competitive challenge. However, our research identified specific, actionable areas where UberEats can differentiate: pricing transparency, personalized discovery, and streamlined reordering.

👥 User Diversity Matters:
Our three personas revealed that friction points vary significantly between new users, busy students, and experienced professionals. A one-size-fits-all approach won't work—solutions must be context-aware and adaptive.

🎯 Severity-Based Prioritization:
By rating pain points on a severity scale, we identified that pricing transparency and personalization are the highest-impact areas for improvement (both rated 4/5 severity across user types).

Other projects

BetterMynd

Marketing

Project Management

BetterMynd is a social impact startup that provides access to mental health services for America’s 20 million college students.